By Henry Umoru, Abuja
The presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC, ahead of the 2027 election, Peter Obi, has urged the governors to allow democracy to thrive in their respective states.
Obi has assured the public that he has no disagreement with his elder brother, Governor Charles Soludo of Anambra State, or with any governor in Nigeria, saying that he is not seeking the office of governor in any state, and he will not seek that position again, even if the Constitution is amended.
In an explanation on his X handle on Friday and made available by the spokesman of Peter Obi Media Office, POMR, Idris Zekeri, Obi admonished the state governors to allow democracy to thrive in their states.
According to him, “I have remained silent over the past few days because I have been grieving the loss of my beloved brother and friend, Chief Okey Ezeibe. However, the time has come for me to address some of the matters that have occupied public discussion in recent days.
“I respectfully urge everyone to concentrate on the existential challenges confronting Nigeria and the hardships endured by its citizens, rather than on the needless distractions that have become widespread in our politics.
“I wish to assure the public that I have no disagreement with my dear elder brother, Governor Soludo, or with any governor in Nigeria. I am not seeking the office of governor in any state, and I will not seek that position again, even if the Constitution is amended.
“Accordingly, I appeal to governors to support whichever presidential candidate they choose while also permitting and assisting other presidential candidates and contenders for other offices to campaign freely and without interruption in their states. Ultimately, voters should be allowed to determine whom they wish to serve.
“Regarding the multilateral funding inaccurately described as “debt owed by Peter Obi” in Anambra State, I wish to state unequivocally:
“As Governor of Anambra State, I did not approach any financial institution to borrow funds or issue a bond on behalf of the state. Indeed, at his farewell ceremony, the then Director-General of the DMO, Abraham Nwankwo, appointed me chairman and declared that, during his 10 years in office, I was the only state governor who had not approached him for a loan facility.
“When I left the office, the Anambra State Government owed no unpaid salaries, gratuities, or pensions. Neither did it owe any contractor or supplier who had completed work that the government had verified and certified.
“Regarding development financing from the World Bank, these are concessionary development-support funds secured by the Federal Government for states selected by it to address specific needs. Repayment is spread over 25 to 30 years.
“The Anambra State Government must therefore differentiate among three separate figures: the total amount approved for the multiyear development programme; the amount Anambra State actually drew during my tenure; and the funding balance outstanding when I handed over on 17 March 2014.
“The government has combined these distinct categories, added them together, and described the resulting US$123.77 million as “loans left by Peter Obi.” That is an incorrect application of public-sector accounting.
He added that the eight facilities identified were mainly World Bank and International Fund for Agricultural Development, IFAD, programmes negotiated by the Federal Government.
“They were not conventional commercial loans that I personally secured during my tenure,” Obi said.
The former governor also questioned the debt figures cited by the Anambra government, saying Debt Management Office records showed the state’s external debt at about $18 million when he assumed office in March 2006 and about $30 million when he left office in March 2014.
“The clearest contradiction appears in the government’s own figures. It states that the original facilities amounted to approximately US$123.77 million and that US$92.35 million remained outstanding in June 2026,” he said.
“However, the DMO’s published records showed Anambra’s total external debt at approximately US$18 million when I began my tenure in March 2006, about US$30 million in March 2014, when I left office, and approximately US$45.15 million as of 31 December 2014, nine months after my departure.”
Obi therefore challenged the state government to explain how Anambra could have inherited $123.77 million from him when the state’s recorded external debt was about $30 million when he left office.
“The Anambra State Government must therefore clarify how a state whose recorded external debt was about US$30 million in March 2014 and US$45.15 million in December 2014 could supposedly have inherited US$123.77 million from Peter Obi, who left office in March of that same year,” he said.
“On the day I left the office, I left more than US$150 million as the dollar component of my investment in Anambra State as governor. I hereby provide documents that can be verified with the various banks,” he said.
He claimed the investment was expected to generate about $10 million annually for the state and argued that the funds could have been used to reduce the alleged debt.
Obi said he would not engage further in a public exchange over his tenure as governor.
“Through this clarification, I wish to state categorically that I will neither engage nor trade words with anyone regarding my tenure in Anambra State. My focus will now be on issues affecting the suffering Nigerian masses, which is the reason for my presidential ambition,” he said.
